On Friday I had a Skarsgard movie marathon. I saw Stellan in Our Kind of Traitor that afternoon and in the evening I saw Alexander in The Legend of Tarzan. I actually liked this new adaptation of the Edgar Rice Burroughs classic more than I thought I would (and not just because Alexander Skarsgard looks pretty, which he does). The film begins with Tarzan (Skarsgard) back in England as the fifth earl of Greystoke with flashbacks to his life in the jungle being raised by apes. He is lured back to Africa because an envoy of King Leopold, Leon Rom (Christoph Waltz, the ultimate villain), has promised to deliver him to a tribal chief in return for diamonds which the bankrupt king desperately needs. Tarzan is joined by his wife Jane (Margot Robbie) and a former American soldier, George Washington Williams (an ever-amusing Samuel L. Jackson), who suspects King Leopold of enslaving the African people. The action sequences are great and I loved the scenes where Tarzan plays with a group of lions and communes with elephants, although I was a bit disappointed that the animals are very obviously digital (the animals are much more realistic in The Jungle Book). However, it is the message about colonialism and exploitation that I found to be particularly compelling (and completely unexpected). The character Rom is so menacing that I spent much of the movie wondering how Tarzan was going to get revenge and I almost cheered out loud when it happened (a great scene). I also really liked the character of Jane because she is so feisty and self-sufficient (having also been raised in the jungle) and doesn't necessarily need Tarzan to swoop in and rescue her. To be sure, there are flaws but I enjoyed this movie. I am always pleasantly surprised when a summer blockbuster has a compelling story so I would definitely recommend it.
Monday, July 4, 2016
Sunday, July 3, 2016
Our Kind of Traitor
As a huge fan of John Le Carre (I've read all of his books), I have been looking forward to the movie adaptation of Our Kind of Traitor for weeks. I saw it Friday afternoon and it is pretty good with only a few minor deviations from the book. Perry Makepeace (Ewan McGregor) and his wife Gail (Naomie Harris) are on vacation in Marrakesh trying to salvage their marriage when they cross paths with Dima (Stellan Skarsgard) who purports to be a money launderer with the Russian mafia. He has sensitive information about British nationals who have ties to the Russian mafia and asks Perry to give this information to MI6 because he fears for his life. Perry agrees and eventually meets with an agent named Hector (Damian Lewis) in London. Hector has bad blood with an MP who is one of the British nationals implicated by Dima's information. Hoping to get revenge, Hector sends Perry and Gail on an unsanctioned mission to get proof from Dima who will only cooperate if his family is granted asylum in England. The tension mounts as Perry and Gail race from Paris, to Switzerland, and the French Alps as they try to protect Dima and his family. I thought it was incredibly suspenseful and much of the suspense comes from the fact that you don't really know who you can trust. Both Skarsgard and Lewis (I like him in just about everything he does) give great performances as the larger than life mobster and the devious agent, respectively. When I first saw the previews for this movie, I thought that Ewan McGregor was entirely miscast as an academic who is bullied into a situation for which he is ill-equipped (I always think of him as the cocky, devil-may-care Alex from Shallow Grave). But he almost seems diminished in his portrayal of a man caught up in events beyond his control (I had to look up how tall he is because I thought he looked so small and vulnerable on screen). His characterization is spot-on and I found him to be very compelling as Perry. This movie felt very Hitchcockian (including a very interesting McGuffin) which is always a good thing in my opinion. I love spy movies (cliches and all) and I recommend this movie to other fans of the genre.
Saturday, July 2, 2016
Motown The Musical
Imagine a concert featuring the Temptations, the Four Tops, Diana Ross and the Supremes, Marvin Gaye, Smokey Robinson and the Miracles, Stevie Wonder, and the Jackson 5. That is essentially what it felt like last Thursday night at the Capitol Theatre when I saw a performance of Motown The Musical. As you can imagine, it was incredible because the actors looked and sounded so much like the Motown recording artists they portrayed. The musical tells the story of the rise and fall of Motown Records, particularly highlighting the tempestuous relationship between founder Berry Gordy (Chester Gregory) and his superstar Diana Ross (Allison Semmes). Interspersed with the telling of the history of Motown is the music from their legendary catalogue. My favorites included "Where Did Our Love Go," "My Girl," "Stop in the Name of Love," "I Heard It Through the Grapevine," "Baby I Need Your Lovin'," "War," "Ball of Confusion," "I Want You Back," "ABC," "Reach Out (I'll Be There)," "Mercy, Mercy Me," and "Get Ready." It is such great music and the choreography and period costumes made every number spectacular. People in the audience were singing, clapping, cheering, and practically dancing in the aisles! I really loved Semmes' portrayal of Diana Ross, especially during the song "Reach Out and Touch," because she immitated all of her mannerisms perfectly (I laughed out loud when she flipped her hair). However, J.J. Batteast completely stole the show as the young Michael Jackson. Where did they find this kid? He sounded and, more importantly, he danced just like Michael Jackson. Those scenes were the highlight of the show for me. If you are a fan of this music, I highly recommend that you see this musical if you have the opportunity. Unfortunately, the run at the Capitol Theatre ended last night.
Note: My only complaint is that I wished that every song could have been performed in its entirety. There were just so many that had to be included!
Friday, July 1, 2016
Summer Reading: The Sense of an Ending
I think The Sense of an Ending by Julian Barnes is one of those books that people are either going to love or hate. I loved it! On the surface it seems like an ordinary story about an ordinary middle-aged man looking back on a rather mundane life, particularly his memories of his three best friends from school and his first girlfriend. But it is anything but ordinary when our hero, Tony Webster, is forced to make contact with his old girlfriend after the death of one of his friends, causing everything he believes about his past to be challenged. The events are first presented in a linear way and then, at the midway point, they are presented again, backwards with hindsight. It is, in my opinion, a brilliant device because there are quite a few "a-ha" moments as you read the second half. What I liked best is that we are left still guessing about what really happened with only the sense of an ending. It is a study in character development and not a lot actually happens but I found it to be is so interesting because I think we all rewrite our personal history to suit our opinions of ourselves. The writing is absolutely exquisite. Barnes has a way of conveying so much meaning with only a few words. I found myself reading a particular phrase and then stopping to think about it for a while. This book is just the kind of perfect little gem that I love and I think I could read it again and again and derive just as much enjoyment as the first time. I highly recommend it knowing full-well that a lot of people might hate it.
Thursday, June 30, 2016
Genius
Yesterday I saw the movie Genius and it seems as if I am the only person who liked it (aside from a few employees at the Broadway who gushed about it with me afterwards). I guess you have to be an English teacher to enjoy this movie and, since I am one, I loved it. It begins in 1929 when Max Perkins (Colin Firth), a long-time editor at Charles Scribner's Sons responsible for editing the works of F. Scott Fitzgerald (Guy Pearce) and Ernest Hemingway (Dominic West), receives a giant manuscript and begins reading what will become Look Homeward, Angel by Thomas Wolfe (Jude Law). Thus begins a tumultuous relationship between the taciturn Perkins and the effervescent Wolfe, to the detriment of their other relationships, namely with Perkins' wife (Laura Linney) and children and Wolfe's patron and lover (Nicole Kidman). The narrative focuses on their attempt to edit what would become Of Time and the River from an unwieldy 1,000 page manuscript in crates to an eventual best-seller. This movie is probably a hard sell to most people but I thoroughly enjoyed the scenes where they walked through the city editing the book line by line. I always tell my students that word choice is so important! One of my favorite scenes is when Perkins takes a red pencil to the manuscript of A Farewell to Arms! Can you imagine! Hemingway uses so few adjectives that it is remarkable that someone could find something to remove! Yes, I know that I am a nerd. No one else in the theater drew in a breath at that moment. Firth, Law, and Kidman give marvelous performances, especially Kidman as Wolfe's over the top and jealous lover. (For some reason Linney just doesn't do it for me and she seemed rather bland). I loved this movie, but at the end of the day, it is a movie about editing so take my recommendation with that in mind; however, if you enjoy movies about complicated relationships between interesting people you might like it.
Note: My only criticism of this movie is that these bastions of American literature are all played by British and Australian actors.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)