The Wizard of the Kremlin

The second movie in my double feature at the Broadway yesterday was The Wizard of the Kremlin.  I found it very intriguing because I love Russian history but also a bit of a slog to get through (can both things be true?).  An American academic named Lawrence Rowland (Jeffrey Wright) arrives in Moscow to research a Russian author when he is contacted by Vadim Baranov (Paul Dano) and invited to his isolated dacha to interview him about his former role as advisor to Vladimir Putin (Jude Law).  Barasov chronicles his rise from an avant-garde theatre director after the fall of communism to become the producer of trashy reality television during the surge in organized crime and then a media mogul as the new class of oligarchs manipulate the rule of Boris Yeltsin (George Sogis).  When the oligarchs realize that Yeltsin's health is declining, they handpick Putin, the balding and nondescript leader of the FSB, to be his successor because they think he will be easy to manage only to have him take control of the media away from them.  Baranov quickly makes himself indispensable to Putin and helps him manipulate public opinion about the Second Chechen War, the sinking of the Kursk submarine, and the invasion of the Crimea (the start of the war in Ukraine).  He also uses internet trolls to destabilize events in the West and propaganda during the Sochi Winter Olympics to change the world's perception of Russia.  However, it is his love for a woman named Ksenia (Alicia Vikander) that ultimately leads to his downfall.  Baranov is a fictionalized character (loosely based on Vladislav Surkov) who is at the fulcrum of Russian history from the dissolution of the Soviet Union to the formation of the current autocracy but the narrative is simultaneously bloated with too much information and superficial without providing any insight.  My mind wandered multiple times during the endless exposition dumps.  Even though Dano, Law, and Vikander give fascinating performances (their inconsistent accents notwithstanding), their characters are very thinly drawn and I didn't really learn anything new about Putin.  I recommend giving this a miss.

Note:  I think this might have worked better as a limited series.

Omaha

Yesterday I had a double feature at the Broadway in the middle of the day (with a large group of other retired people who are now my new best friends) and I started with Omaha.  When this movie premiered at the Sundance Film Festival two years ago, the filmmakers (who are from Utah) invited so many friends and family members that even pass holders were not able to get into the screening. A lot of people were really upset but I knew that it would eventually come to the Broadway so I just got in line for something else.  Needless to say, after all of that drama I was really excited to finally be able to see it but it left me feeling very bleak.  An unnamed father (John Magaro) suddenly wakes his two children, nine-year-old Ella (Molly Belle Wright) and six-year-old Charlie (Wyatt Solis), early in the morning in order to go on a cross-country road trip along with their golden retriever Rex.  Ella is immediately suspicious because he won't tell them where they are going and she starts noticing other clues that lead her to believe that something about this trip is very wrong.  It is implied that their mother is dead and that the bank is foreclosing on their house but it is obvious that their father is on edge and that he is rapidly running out of money.  They have a series of adventures, including flying a kite on the Bonneville Salt Flats, swimming in a motel pool, and visiting a zoo together, but the real reason for their trip is finally revealed when they arrive in Nebraska.  I thought that I knew where the narrative was going because, like Ella, I also noticed the clues but the resolution is somehow even worse than I was expecting and I'm not sure how I am supposed to feel about the father's actions because there is almost no context provided.  The action is very episodic and impressionistic with no exposition and very little dialogue so I was left with many questions, chief among them being why they had to go to Nebraska (this is answered in a closing title card that left me gutted as well as frustrated).  Magaro gives an incredible performance because he becomes more and more agitated as the trip goes on while trying to create happy memories with his children (it is a tightrope of emotion and he balances it well).  I was also very impressed with Wright because you can see the worry on her face even as she tries to give her father the benefit of the doubt and shield her brother from her growing suspicions (it is one of the best performances by a child that I have seen).  This is absolutely devastating but I don't think it goes far enough in its indictment of the father's circumstances.

Fiddler on the Roof at CPT

I went with both of my sisters to see Fiddler on the Roof at CPT last night and we really enjoyed this production. In my opinion, seeing this classic musical is a guaranteed fun night out and I noticed that everyone around me (the theatre was packed) had big smiles on their faces during all of the well-known song and dance numbers. I definitely had to stop myself from singing along with the cast during "Tradition," "Matchmaker," "If I Were a Rich Man," "Sabbath Prayer," "To Life," and "Sunrise, Sunset." I loved the choreography and staging because there are obvious influences from the original Broadway production and the 1971 movie but also some fun new details that keep things fresh, particularly when the women and girls circle around the praying men and boys in "Tradition," when Yente is shown alone in "Sabbath Prayer," when the townspeople come on stage to reprise "Tradition" after Tevye rejects Chava at the end of "Chavaleh," and when the Constable and soldiers escort the townspeople out of Anatevka. As always, my favorite numbers were "To Life" because the Russian dance is very high-energy and exuberant, "The Wedding" because the bottle dance is thrilling, and "Tevye's Dream" because I always eagerly anticipate seeing how Fruma-Sarah will make her entrance (when I played her I came up from Tevye and Golde's bed) and it did not disappoint because she flies and it is pretty spectacular! The set is really beautiful with an elaborate thatched-roof house made of wood that opens up to reveal the interior and other large wooden set pieces that come down from the rafters and in from the wings to become the village inn, Motel's tailor shop, and the railway station. I loved the attention to detail, especially the smoke that periodically comes from the chimney, the barrels inside the inn, and the weathered trees all around the proscenium. The costumes are also very striking and I liked the pops of green and yellow used in the women's dresses and the white tattered gown worn by Fruma-Sarah. The large puppets that feature in "Tevye's Dream" are scary but incredibly cool. Finally, the cast is outstanding! Danny Inkley is a boisterous Tevye who emphasizes the humor in "If I Were a Rich Man" and "To Life" but he is also quite vulnerable in "Do You Love Me?" (Golde is played by his wife Wendy Inkley and their interactions feel very authentic) and absolutely heartbreaking in "Chavaleh" (the crack in his voice brought a tear to my eye). I was also impressed with Jordyn Tracy, Chloe Warnas, and Maren Messerly as Tzeitel, Hodel, and Chava, respectively, because they harmonize beautifully in "Matchmaker." This production is a crowd-pleaser that the whole family will enjoy and I highly recommend getting a ticket (go here). It runs on the Mountain America Main Stage through June 18.

Note:  I find it amusing that the 2026 season at CPT includes both See How They Run and Fiddler on the Roof because my two biggest acting roles to date are Miss Skillon and Fruma-Sarah (I was also in the chorus of Damn Yankees but I haven't seen that performed since my high school did it in 1985).

Les Miserables at Tuacahn Amphitheatre

Before I became obsessed with Hamilton, Les Miserables had a 30 year run as my favorite musical.  I still absolutely love it and try to see it every chance I get so I took a quick road trip to St. George yesterday for a production at Tuacahn Ampitheatre.  It was an incredible experience to see such an epic story performed against the dramatic red rock of the ampitheatre!  I have obviously seen this show many times so I really appreciated several bold changes in the staging, particularly the use of the natural backdrop in the Prologue when the prisoners in the chain gang cut the red rock into blocks using pick axes and the use of real farm animals as Valjean searches the countryside for work.  I was also struck by the inclusion of Young Eponine on the periphery in the scenes between Valjean and Young Cosette because it really adds to her characterization and I was incredibly moved when the women place articles of clothing worn by the students who died on the barricade at the edge of the stage during "Turning" and then when the students rise up from the pit to claim them during "Empty Chairs at Empty Tables" (this song always makes me cry).  I had goosebumps during "Stars" because the stars projected on the red rock are so beautiful and during the final battle on the barricade because the pyrotechnics are pretty spectacular.  I was very impressed with the cast, especially with how Mindy Smoot Robbins as Fantine, Randal Keith as Javert, Kelsey Lee Smith as Eponine, David Toole as Valjean, and Coby Oram as Marius (the understudy) are able to command such a large stage by themselves in "I Dreamed a Dream," "Stars," "On My Own," "Bring Him Home," and "Empty Chairs at Empty Tables," respectively.  The large LED screens feature illustrations reminiscent of the ones used by Victor Hugo in his novel and elaborate set pieces are configured and reconfigured to become the factory and waterfront in Montreuil-sur-Mer, the Thenardiers' inn, the streets of Paris, the barricade, and the sewers.  The period costumes are very much informed by those in the original production but I found the wide-legged trousers worn by the guards and sailors to be very amusing.  This is the biggest show I've seen at Tuacahn (it is even bigger than their 2008 production of Les Miserables) and it is so well-done!  It was definitely worth the four hour drive to see it and I highly recommend getting a ticket (go here).  It is being performed in the Outdoor Amphitheatre at Tuachan in repertory with Disney's Finding Nemo and Grease through October 23.

Obsession

Last night my nephew and I went to a Thursday preview of Obsession and we both had so much fun watching it with a big crowd.  Baron "Bear" Bailey (Michael Johnston) wants to tell his childhood friend Nikki Freeman (Inde Navarrette) that he has feelings for her but his co-workers Ian (Cooper Tomlinson) and Sarah (Megan Lawless) try to talk him out of it (for reasons).  When he misses a perfect opportunity to tell her in a moment of vulnerability, Bear uses a novelty item to wish for Nikki to love him more than anything in the world.  His wish immediately comes true although both he and Nikki recognize that something is amiss when she makes advances towards him.  He eventually comes to enjoy her attentions and they become a couple much to the chagrin of Ian and Sarah.  However, Nikki is increasingly needy, then possessive, and then absolutely terrifying.  Even though he fears for his life, Bear ultimately realizes that Nikki is the real victim and takes drastic steps to cancel his wish.  The scenes in which Nikki shows her *ahem* devotion are so much fun to watch, especially in a packed theater, because they are uncomfortably disturbing (the people in our audience were either laughing out loud or jumping out of their seats and, at one point, I wanted to throw up).  I loved the way these scenes are lit and framed because Nikki is often obscured and that adds to the unbearable tension.  Johnston is perfect as a character so passive that he doesn't even recognize that the girl he has a crush on might reciprocate his feelings without having to go to such extraordinary lengths and watching his downward spiral is oddly compelling (I loved his mannerisms and facial expressions) but Navarrette is brilliant because she is absolutely unhinged (in the best possible way) and yet she is also sympathetic as a woman who has lost her agency.  This is much more thought-provoking that it might seem on the surface but it is so wildly entertaining that my nephew and I had a blast with it.  I highly recommend it to fans of the genre.