Here

The second movie in the double feature my nephew and I saw last night was Here.  I was really intrigued by the premise but I was ultimately disappointed in the execution of it.  This portrays events that occur at one location, and one single point of view, from prehistory to today.  The narrative is non-linear and includes the extinction of the dinosaurs, an indigenous man (Joel Oulette) and woman (Dannie McCallum) who live on the land where the house will eventually be built, the colonial governor of New Jersey (Daniel Betts) who lives on a plantation that becomes a museum across the street from the house, a man at the turn of the century (Gwilym Lee) obsessed with flying and his disdainful wife (Michelle Dockery) who are the first inhabitants of the house, an inventor (David Flynn) and his pin-up model wife (Ophelia Lovibond) who live in the house during the 1930s, and Devon Harris (Nicholas Pinnock) and his wife Helen (Nikki Amuka-Bird) and son Justin (Cache Vanderpuye) who live in the house during the COVID-19 pandemic.  However, most of the timeline involves Al and Rose Young (Paul Bettany and Kelly Reilly, respectively), a couple who buys the house at the end of World War II and raises their family there through the mid-2000s.  Their son Richard (Tom Hanks) marries Margaret (Robin Wright) when she gets pregnant and they also live in the house and raise their daughter Vanessa (Zsa Zsa Zemeckis) there.  The static camera angle is really clever at first but then it left me feeling kind of bored and detached from the action.  The scenes are short and move through the timelines very haphazardly (the transitions occur with an outline of a shape through which you see one timeline inserted into another one) so a lot of the emotional impact is lost because, just when you feel a connection, the scene changes.  Hanks, Wright, and Bettany, especially, are great but almost everyone else inexplicably overacts.  At one point, my nephew and I looked at each other and had to stifle laughter behind our hands during what is meant to be a poignant moment.  I found the message to be very depressing (my nephew disliked it even more than I did) because Al and Rose buy the house thinking that they are achieving the American dream after the war but the house eventually stifles all of Richard's dreams.  I also think the score by Alan Silvestri is incredibly manipulative.  This movie thinks it is more profound than it actually is and I recommend skipping it (or at least waiting for it to stream).